The Barren Rocks of Aden

Confronting Terrorism…or Not

David C. Stolinsky, MD
Jan. 11, 2010

I’ve always loved the sound of bagpipes. I learned to do so as a child at the movies. I saw films like “Gunga Din.” The film was hardly a realistic portrayal of the British experience in India, but it did teach me that homicidal religious fanatics must be suppressed by military force. And the film also taught me to associate the sound of the pipes with the approach of rescuers.

Recently I was looking through my music files, and I came across one I had forgotten, “The Barren Rocks of Aden.” It commemorates the time when Aden was a British naval base. From 1874 to 1967, British naval, land and later air forces were stationed there to protect the outlet from the Red Sea into the Indian Ocean. This represented a key choke point on the trade route from Europe via the Suez Canal to India and beyond. But then the Brits left.

Aden harbor was the site of the suicide bombing of USS Cole by Al Qaeda in 2000. The ship was almost sunk, with 17 killed and 39 wounded. Earlier in 2000, a similar attack had been attempted against USS The Sullivans, but the small boat was so overloaded with explosives that it sank. However, Al Qaeda is nothing if not persistent, and they succeeded against the Cole.

The Sullivans is the only U.S. Navy ship named after more than one person. The name honors the five Sullivan brothers who were killed when their ship was sunk off Guadalcanal in World War II. From this incident we learn the following: (1) This was the greatest loss by any American family in World War II. (2) It is unwise to station close relatives together in wartime. (3) Freedom isn’t free, but some pay a very high price, while others are freeloaders and ingrates.

The waters around Aden are infested with Somali pirates. We recently cheered the rescue of Captain Phillips of the Maersk Alabama, when Navy SEALS simultaneously shot the three pirates holding him hostage. But we have the right − in fact, the duty − to question why these waters remain infested with pirates in the first place.

And now, Yemen is also a hotbed of Al Qaeda activity. There the bomber of Northwest 253 had 80 grams of high explosive sewed into his underwear. There Imam Awlaki e-mailed his protégé, the Fort Hood shooter, advice on attacking fellow soldiers. Awlaki recently survived an air strike. But would he survive a raid by Special Forces?

There is a limit to what an air strike can accomplish, especially when it is carried out by Yemenis, who may have divided loyalties. Sometimes what is needed is a team of SEALS, Force Recon Marines or Green Berets − or a sniper and his spotter. When all else fails, one can use the method of Carlos Hathcock and his more recent disciples.

Does this sound brutal? Is killing a few enemy leaders more brutal than air strikes or ground assaults in which hundreds or thousands of young troops are killed? By any moral or legal standard, killing a few leaders is less brutal − more difficult, perhaps, but less brutal.

Aden remains a key choke point in the flow of world trade. It remains vulnerable to terrorism and piracy. When I played the music file of “The Barren Rocks of Aden,” I was reminded that Aden used to be a British naval and air base, and I realized that the world would be a safer place if it still were.

Interestingly, the best video clip of this tune that I found was by a pipe band in Luxembourg − hardly a part of Scotland. This fact leads me to conclude that love of music is universal. It also leads me to conclude that love of freedom, which the skirl of pipes evokes, is also universal, or at least widespread.

If Luxembourgers can form an outstanding pipe band, perhaps others can take the place of the British in patrolling the waters around Aden. Clearly, the United Nations is not up to the job. To call the U.N. impotent is to insult eunuchs. At least they have an excuse for inaction.

The United Nations has been called the United Governments, to indicate that most of the 192 member regimes are far from democratic and do not represent their peoples. But even this title is optimistic − often the U.N. is very far from united. Many member regimes range from authoritarian to despotic. Can any sane person claim that the Iranian theocracy represents the Iranian people, when street demonstrations are being brutally suppressed almost daily?

Who can replace the Royal Navy in patrolling the Gulf of Aden, now that two world wars and socialism have reduced Britain to the status that it can barely protect its own sailors and marines, much less protect the shipping of other nations? Clearly, Britannia no longer rules the waves. No one does. The U.S. Navy is the world’s most powerful, but repeated cuts and widespread responsibilities have stretched it thin − perhaps too thin.

Liberals often ask, “Who made America the world’s policeman?” The answer, of course, is, “No one.” But liberals misinterpret the answer. America didn’t rip the badge of world policeman from the shirt of the United Nations, which had been wearing it honorably. No, we found the badge lying in the gutter, where the U.N. had dropped it. We picked up the badge, cleaned off the mud, and looked around to see whether anyone else wanted it. When no one did, we pinned it on our own chest.

The problem is not that we appropriated the badge. The problem is that no one else wants it, but we no longer seem to have the desire or the ability to wear it effectively. If we are unwilling to increase the size of our military, then we need to join with other free nations to create an effective force. This assumes that other nations would be willing and able to join us − a dubious assumption. So it almost certainly is up to us. The alternative is chaos.

In the early 19th century, in the days of sailing ships and muzzle-loading guns, international chaos was less dangerous. Yet President Jefferson did not tolerate it. When North African pirates interfered with the free passage of ships, he sent the infant U.S. Navy and Marine Corps to solve the problem. They did so, the origin of “To the shores of Tripoli” in the Marines’ Hymn.

But in the era of 9/11, with long-range missiles, and nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, chaos is far too dangerous to tolerate. Yet to a great extent, we tolerate it. People who tolerate the intolerable will themselves become intolerable − and eventually extinct.

The sound of bagpipes is still stirring. The rocks of Aden are still barren. The waters around them, and the other key choke points along trade routes, still need to be patrolled against pirates and terrorists. But who will do it?

Dr. Stolinsky writes on political and social issues. Contact: dstol@prodigy.net.

www.stolinsky.com