This Townhall article delineates the problems with voting in the one-party state of California. It explains why, after all this time, the votes are still being counted. But as a California resident, I find it painful to read.
Nobel-prize physicist Richard Feynman died in 1988, but his lectures are still studied at Cal Tech. Feynman had a special problem with “corrected” data. He wanted to see the original data. Whenever a researcher presented “corrected” data, Feynman was sure to ask two questions:
1) How did you know in which direction the”correction” should go?
2) How did you know when to stop “correcting”?
That is, was this a real correction, meant to remove systematic errors? Or was it a fudge factor, meant to push the data in the direction you intended before you even started the experiment?
Feynman’s questions apply in fields other than physics – for example, in elections. How many times have we heard that Candidate A was leading by a comfortable margin on election night, only to be told that a week later, so many mail-in ballots came in that Candidate B in fact had won? And, surprise! Candidate B was of the party controlling the counting.
And then the videos appeared on the internet, showing unknown people pulling armloads of unverified ballots from unknown voters out of car trunks at 2 am, then stuffing them into unguarded drop boxes. But soon the videos disappeared from the internet. And we all pretended we never saw them, so Biden and Harris did their thing for four years.
Paging Dr. Feynman, Dr. Richard Feynman, call your office. You are needed at the election center.
The photo shows Dr. Feynman explaining with a glass of ice water why the Challenger spacecraft blew up. The cold temperature caused the rubber seals to shrink and leak. Man, could we use him now.
